Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 118% (18th of 132)

Based on 441 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16 4x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Corsair CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16 4x16GB averaged 17.6% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Corsair CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16 4x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 52GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 39.7GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16 4x16GB is 61.6%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Corsair CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16 4x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 68.5ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 28.2GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 441 samples)
Min Avg Max
30.9 MC Read 52 74
26.2 MC Write 39.1 46.8
28.3 MC Mixed 39.7 46.8
125% 43.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
18 SC Read 28.2 33.2
19.7 SC Write 29.2 47.9
26 SC Mixed 36.8 44
89.7% 31.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
55.1 Latency 68.5 87.6
58.4% 68.5 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 75
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 43.1
154% 53.9 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 40.3
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 72.1
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 45.5
154% 53.8 GB/s
SC Read 30.5
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 39.8
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 57.9
MC Write 44.3
MC Mixed 44.4
140% 48.9 GB/s
SC Read 31.6
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 40.6
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 32.8
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 51.5
SC Mixed 33.7
102% 35.8 GB/s
Latency 46.7
86% 46.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 42.3
MC Mixed 31.5
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 51.3
SC Mixed 32.3
101% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 52
77% 52 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 30.6
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 26.6
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
441 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,307,095 RAM Kits tested

Typical CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16 4x16GB Builds (Compare 4,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $1,826

Popular CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16 4x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback