Today's hottest deals

MSI Z97S SLI Krait Edition (MS-7922)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7922
MotherboardMSI Z97S SLI Krait Edition (MS-7922)  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '16 at 19:46
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$43
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 271
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 534
72% 536 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Lighting 71.7
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 81.3
58% 72.5 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 57.4
Splatting 81.1
57% 67.5 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200
223GB free
Firmware: R201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 474
Write 235
Mixed 309
75% 339 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 13.1
115% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 73.6
106% 197 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 348
Mixed 417
93% 418 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 43
166% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 110
135% 240 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 71.8
Write 80.8
Mixed 89.3
61% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.2
100% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
736GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 154
Mixed 147
118% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.28
81% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 19.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 21.4
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97S SLI Krait Edition (MS-7922) Builds (Compare 2,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97S SLI Krait Edition (MS-7922) - $127

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $775
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback