Asus MAXIMUS VIII GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII GENE  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171226
Uptime11.5 Days
Run DateAug 08 '18 at 08:14
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 228
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 683
64% 530 Pts
64-Core 684
42% 684 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 5988) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1569 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.24
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Lighting 92.7
Reflection 91.5
Parallax 80.7
76% 88.3 fps
MRender 83.2
Gravity 80.8
Splatting 72.4
64% 78.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 386 404 420 408 380 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,930
Write 910
Mixed 666
SusWrite 414
215% 980 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 48.3
181% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 453
346% 480 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 180%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
143GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 462 475 479 476 478 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 470
Mixed 415
SusWrite 460
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 44.8
161% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 349
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Micron_1 100_MTFDDAK2T0TB 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
181% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 246
Mixed 214
SusWrite 79.3
248% 183 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 25.9
2,402% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.1
DQ Write 44.4
DQ Mixed 29.3
2,566% 29.9 MB/s
Samsung SSD 850 PRO 256G 256GB
11GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 258
Write 138
Mixed 168
SusWrite 79.3
197% 161 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 29.7
2,539% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 44.4
DQ Mixed 30.1
2,633% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 191%
Great: 259%
Samsung SSD 840 Series 500GB
135GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 79 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
167% Outstanding
Read 145
Write 71.8
Mixed 108
SusWrite 78.4
128% 101 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 20.1
2,128% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 44.4
DQ Mixed 22.7
2,370% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 167%
Great: 167%
Samsung SSD 850 PRO 512G 512GB
315GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 259
Write 206
Mixed 216
SusWrite 79.4
245% 190 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 29.3
2,546% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 44.4
DQ Mixed 33.6
2,753% 35 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 192%
Great: 192%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 31.1
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 21.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII GENE Builds (Compare 1,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII GENE - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $698
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback