Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '16 at 04:39
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 30.1
2-Core 67.1
43% 60.5 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 410
34% 295 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 5988) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6472
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.8% Average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 79.7
41% 65.3 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 81.3
Splatting 73
62% 75.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB
33GB free
Firmware: 0002 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 350
Write 141
Mixed 202
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 4.83
75% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 22.3
41% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 62%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
19GB free
Firmware: DXT06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 432
Write 53.1
Mixed 84
40% 190 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 12.6
74% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 77.7
DQ Mixed 25.2
37% 71 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 89%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 496
Write 251
Mixed 396
84% 381 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 32.9
116% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 53.5
55% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung SSD 850 PRO 512G 512GB
328GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 20.8
Write 20.8
Mixed 20.8
27% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 6.74
4K Mixed 3.64
376% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 192%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback