Asus H81M-D PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-D PLUS (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140515
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '18 at 18:07
Run Duration	1114 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 77.8 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 169 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 313 34% 272 Pts	64-Core 301 19% 301 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% XFX(1682 9275) 2GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.7.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Lighting 37.1 Reflection 33.6 Parallax 44.3 30% 38.3 fps	MRender 29.7 Gravity 30.7 Splatting 38.7 28% 33 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Galax TA1D0120A 120GB 4,895 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 26GB free Firmware: SBFM21R2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 183 181 183 186 179 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 352 Write 349 Mixed 262 SusWrite 191 65% 288 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 19.2 85% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 154 144% 217 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 80%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 140 123 134 134 129 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 151 Write 148 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 132 82% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.4 101% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 103%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 3GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.6 4 3.1 3.1 3.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.32% Terrible	Read 18.8 Write 1.5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 3.2 7% 7.25 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 2.2 122% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.32% Great: 13%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.2 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	8.14% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 2.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 2.9 7% 7.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.1 126% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.14% Great: 13%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 14,254 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 4 3.5 3.1 3.4 3.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	4.86% Terrible	Read 22.5 Write 2.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3.3 8% 8.05 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.86% Great: 7%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 3GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.8 3.4 3.2 3.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	6.52% Terrible	Read 19 Write 3 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 3.6 8% 7.72 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2 105% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.52% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0423 Team-Elite-1600 16GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.9% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 16.9 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.1 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-D PLUS Builds (Compare 474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D PLUS

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	75x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	70x
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	43x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	25x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	20x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	17x
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 55%, 1,721 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $360

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383