Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '18 at 21:46
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 214
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 651
64% 523 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 18.4
16% 20.3 fps
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 25.7
20% 22.7 fps
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 563 544 536 526 531 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 700
Write 511
Mixed 614
SusWrite 543
133% 592 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 75
249% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 834
591% 751 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 170%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
144GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 370 394 425 419 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 440
Mixed 300
SusWrite 399
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 47.5
176% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 279
230% 330 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
280GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 100 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 103
Write 95
Mixed 60
SusWrite 99.6
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
25GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 64 37 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 150
Write 55.7
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 39.8
90% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.6
81% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMX8GX3M2A2000C9 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMX8GX3M2A2000C9 16GB
1600, 1867, 1600, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.8% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback