Today's hottest deals

Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER C15M
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140409
Uptime19.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '16 at 11:50
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 95%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2820-$139
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Memory 50.4
1-Core 12.9
2-Core 11
21% 24.8 Pts
4-Core 25.7
8-Core 22.3
3% 24 Pts
64-Core 38
2% 38 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Device(1B0A 2213) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4176
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.81
1% 0.85 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.17
1% 1.12 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 85.8
Write 101
Mixed 91.5
70% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.21
58% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2S4G64CC88C4N-DI 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 4
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 1.5
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback