Asrock X99 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 WS (all builds)
Memory	118.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160816
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '18 at 18:34
Run Duration	375 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 85.1 1-Core 114 2-Core 234 81% 144 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 822 74% 621 Pts	64-Core 1,459 90% 1,459 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6393) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	119% Outstanding	Lighting 153 Reflection 211 Parallax 211 124% 191 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 186 Splatting 131 122% 151 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 70 69 69 69 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 435GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 701 610 573 570 565 573 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	236% Outstanding	Read 1,992 Write 1,698 Mixed 877 SusWrite 599 287% 1,291 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 173 4K Mixed 65.5 244% 94.6 MB/s	DQ Read 769 DQ Write 1,228 DQ Mixed 866 694% 955 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 236% Great: 353%
LSI MR9271-8i 16TB 4.5TB free Firmware: 3.46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 667 661 678 648 641 677 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 440GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2001 2012 2001 2023 1950 1958 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	366% Outstanding	Read 2,255 Write 1,944 Mixed 934 SusWrite 1,991 399% 1,781 MB/s	4K Read 55.2 4K Write 240 4K Mixed 82.1 316% 126 MB/s	DQ Read 1,323 DQ Write 1,258 DQ Mixed 1,178 916% 1,253 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 366% Great: 353%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50 9,565 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 822GB free Firmware: P122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 289 287 284 285 287 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 471 Write 416 Mixed 294 SusWrite 288 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 28.3 118% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 202 155% 204 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 105%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80 10,362 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 178GB free Firmware: 12.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 74 73 74 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 73 Write 73.7 Mixed 51.3 SusWrite 73.5 50% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 51%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB 2,276 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 5.3 4.4 4.5 3.9 4.5 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.94% Terrible	Read 20.8 Write 8.5 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4.4 10% 9.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.94% Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB 5,058 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 2GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 2.4 6 4.8 5.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 3.8 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 5.6 9% 9.92 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.7 162% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 17%
SanDisk Ultra 125GB 1,024 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 29GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 12 11 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 48.7 Write 12.5 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 11.6 18% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.3 132% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	MC Read 56 MC Write 53.9 MC Mixed 50.4 153% 53.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 20.7 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 133%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 WS Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 74%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 WS

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	16x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	9x
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	5x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	3x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
XP960LE30002 960GBBench 131%, 5 samples	4x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	4x

RAM
M393A2G40EB1-CRC 8x16GBSamsungBench 113%, 73 samples	4x
HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 61%, 375 samples	4x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GBSamsungBench 112%, 591 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $464

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16