Dell Precision Tower 3620

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 3620
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 3620  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170124
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 22 '18 at 19:08
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v6
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 249
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 693
64% 532 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 369.39
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 35.8
31% 37.6 fps
MRender 49
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 38.1
33% 41.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 913
Write 880
Mixed 821
195% 871 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 61.1
190% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 956
DQ Write 720
DQ Mixed 807
612% 828 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 170%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA451U7AFR8N-UH 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 29
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 25.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 24.6
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 3620 Builds (Compare 3,342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 3620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback