Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 25 '18 at 02:23
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 834
83% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
EVGA(3842 6797) ≥ 4GB; evga kingpin
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 203
Parallax 183
151% 190 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 178
Splatting 130
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1476 1507 1497 1510 1510 1507 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 1951
Write 1,442
Mixed 673
SusWrite 1,501
311% 1,392 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 65.5
226% 81 MB/s
DQ Read 1,072
DQ Write 937
DQ Mixed 933
719% 981 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 284%
Great: 306%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$144
3TB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 153 158 158 158 161 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 90%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$273
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 142 143 144 143 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 162
Write 139
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 142
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 93%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
262GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 68 71 72 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 120
Write 102
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 70.6
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$80
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 177 178 180 180 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 128
Write 156
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 179
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.9
253% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 90%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$273
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 161 162 161 163 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 162
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 160
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
186% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 93%
Disk Name 256GB
110GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 40.8
Write 42
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 42.7
57% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 14.1
1,200% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.3
DQ Write 21.5
DQ Mixed 15
1,291% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.1
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.9
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,017
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback