Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7300 APU (2014 M.Ka) 6,248 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Memory 59.3 1-Core 54.4 2-Core 79.3 41% 64.3 Pts	4-Core 114 8-Core 114 15% 114 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics 5,093 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 3830) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.8.2 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	4.46% Terrible	Lighting 4.97 Reflection 6.31 Parallax 6.69 4% 5.99 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 7.78 5% 6.24 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.46% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE360000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 72 79 85 70 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 370 Write 68.7 Mixed 6 SusWrite 68 27% 128 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 11.2 52% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 64 DQ Mixed 34.8 40% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G 16GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.7% Poor	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 12.4 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 8.8 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-7300 APU (2014 M.Ka)AMDBench 31%, 6,248 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 5,093 samples	14x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
512GB 512GBV-gen06sm20ar512sdkBench 63%, 11 samples	1x
PH6-CE240-L2 240GBBench 66%, 238 samples	1x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	2x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	1x
CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 51%, 9,208 samples	1x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $51

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16