Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090319
Uptime18.6 Days
Run DateSep 04 '18 at 11:52
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5606
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.3% Average
Memory 53.8
1-Core 27.2
2-Core 62
31% 47.7 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 196
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 194GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 24 21 16 13 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
Read 94.5
Write 46.9
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 20.7
40% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
3968, 12416 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 15.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback