Gigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120831
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateMay 04 '16 at 00:42
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 65
2-Core 120
54% 86.8 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 198
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.7% Average
Lighting 59.3
Reflection 56.1
Parallax 71.9
48% 62.5 fps
MRender 54.9
Gravity 49.5
Splatting 71.8
49% 58.7 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 60GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 174
Write 61.8
Mixed 84
23% 107 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 11.9
77% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 60.8
DQ Write 51.3
DQ Mixed 18.3
24% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 52%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
692GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 111
Write 86.6
Mixed 98.7
75% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.52
115% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
125GB free
Firmware: MJAOA3B0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
61% Good
Read 110
Write 102
Mixed 101
79% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.18
74% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
14GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 78.6
Write 68.2
Mixed 68.2
54% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.28
87% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
485GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 26
Write 25.2
Mixed 25.5
33% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.19
61% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/2 KHX1600C9D3/2 KHX1600C9D3/2 KHX1600C9D3/2 8GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.2
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A85X-UP4 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback