Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive560% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory40.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211013
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 23:27
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$261
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 179
2-Core 353
112% 208 Pts
4-Core 695
8-Core 1,298
119% 997 Pts
64-Core 2,446
151% 2,446 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 111%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
AMD(1002 0E36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 136
Parallax 287
111% 187 fps
MRender 232
Gravity 143
Splatting 170
147% 182 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 119%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$216
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614600WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4559 4750 4762 3296 2412 1711 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
560% Outstanding
Read 4,019
Write 4,755
Mixed 3,159
SusWrite 3,582
875% 3,879 MB/s
4K Read 73.4
4K Write 258
4K Mixed 97.6
373% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1,874
DQ Write 1,110
DQ Mixed 1,605
1,164% 1,529 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 560%
Great: 634%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
593GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 451 435 439 445 443 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 458
Mixed 458
SusWrite 447
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 55.6
187% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 220
166% 223 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
315GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 469 470 469 467 464 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 459
Mixed 386
SusWrite 468
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 60.1
200% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 220
166% 222 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
38GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 291 278 298 362 346 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 438
Write 211
Mixed 233
SusWrite 300
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 28.4
96% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 76.9
DQ Mixed 112
90% 132 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72%
Great: 86%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$124
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 161 161 161 161 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 155
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 161
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
4.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 75.1
Write 87.8
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 90.2
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 67.7
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 40.3
141% 49.4 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 40.2
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 131%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $471

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback