Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 14:08
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User MLT-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$158
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 176
2-Core 352
111% 207 Pts
4-Core 677
8-Core 1,098
109% 888 Pts
64-Core 1,623
100% 1,623 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$520
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
159% Outstanding
Lighting 234
Reflection 214
Parallax 206
191% 218 fps
MRender 250
Gravity 159
Splatting 130
141% 180 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 159%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 852 620 591 391 339 337 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,879
Write 1,442
Mixed 669
SusWrite 522
250% 1,128 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 47.7
202% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 635
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 333
276% 407 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 188%
Great: 254%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
234GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1570 1279 1201 1021 1004 1020 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,534
Write 2,410
Mixed 1,727
SusWrite 1,182
440% 1,963 MB/s
4K Read 64.7
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 91.1
304% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,275
DQ Write 1,017
DQ Mixed 1,126
848% 1,140 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 319%
Great: 372%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$149
12GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 93 104 98 97 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 68.8
Write 83.5
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 93.1
48% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.4
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 33.1
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 38.4
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $893
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback