Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 188%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 228%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME  (all builds)
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '21 at 02:26
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 86.8
1-Core 167
2-Core 329
104% 194 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 1,256
112% 948 Pts
64-Core 2,824
175% 2,824 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$709
Gigabyte(1458 403D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 267
Reflection 218
Parallax 259
218% 248 fps
MRender 298
Gravity 221
Splatting 161
178% 227 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 184%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 297 296 297 297 281 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 441
Mixed 382
SusWrite 310
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 56.4
185% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 201
151% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$139
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2595 2604 2595 1539 1480 1351 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
388% Outstanding
Read 2,671
Write 2,582
Mixed 1,974
SusWrite 2,027
520% 2,314 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 98.1
329% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1389
DQ Write 1,111
DQ Mixed 1,212
917% 1,237 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 388%
Great: 435%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 429 426 425 424 348 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 426
Mixed 405
SusWrite 413
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 51.5
170% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 185
143% 195 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 125%
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 101 90 89 89 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 446
Write 273
Mixed 256
SusWrite 124
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 19.4
74% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 80.4
DQ Mixed 42.6
47% 79.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
529GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 165 166 167 165 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 148
Mixed 104
SusWrite 164
111% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 93.3
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 35.4
154% 54.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 33.8
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 10R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
51% 28% 40 332 267 165 31.5" 2560 1440 AUS32E0 ASUS VG32VQ1B
History: Score 34: 4R 3G 5B | Score 51: 10R 0G 1B
Typical GA-X570 AORUS XTREME Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,866
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback