PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P9X79 WS (all builds) |
Memory | 47.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140305 |
Uptime | 21.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 11 '18 at 22:10 |
Run Duration | 251 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 92% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 361.43
|
18.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65
33GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 231 210 216 212 242 MB/s
|
63.8%
Good
|
|||
Areca RAID#1 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: R001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 620 543 569 597 578 581 MB/s
|
214%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$70
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 93 99 108 105 MB/s
|
73.9%
Very good
|
|||
General USB Flash Disk 64GB
59GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 13 6.8 9.6 9.2 12 MB/s
|
7.48%
Terrible
|
|||
DIGINTEL HotSwap Bay1 512GB
460GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 131 132 131 151 MB/s
|
213%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
91.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 109x |
Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples | 83x |
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 60x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 27x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 25x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 22x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $928 |