Vorke V1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVorke V1  (all builds)
MotherboardTHD RX2
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160608
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 12 '18 at 15:49
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3160
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Memory 41.2
1-Core 22.5
2-Core 44.5
24% 36.1 Pts
4-Core 84.4
8-Core 87.6
11% 86 Pts
64-Core 84.3
5% 84.3 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.51% Terrible
Lighting 1.67
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 2.75
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 2.43
2% 2.19 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.51%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SE50S37480G 480GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 200 189 194 183 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 34.8
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 0.2
31% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 50%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.5 4.5 4.7 4.4 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 35.2
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 4.6
33% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 50%
ST312082 7AS 120GB
62GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 34 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.8% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 9.8
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 33.3
30% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.8 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 6.1
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 1.7
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical V1 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Vorke V1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback