HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 17:31
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 120
52% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 190
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Device(1B0A 9045) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.46
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.41 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.65 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721064CLA332 640GB
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JPGOA3GC
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 82.6
Write 104
Mixed 50.9
59% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 66%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
293GB free
Firmware: 1306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 9.8 13 11 13 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 59%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-22A7B0 640GB
219GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.7
Write 18.2
Mixed 21.1
27% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 22%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
623GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2734
Write 11
Mixed 20.4
616% 922 MB/s
4K Read 375
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.6
1,476% 126 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 2C802C80 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 9801 9905471-011.A00LF 9801 9905471-02X.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.3% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback