Lenovo Lenovo IdeaPad N586

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo Lenovo IdeaPad N586  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo IdeaPad N586
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '16 at 01:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-4400M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 29.7
31% 40 Pts
4-Core 31.6
8-Core 33.8
4% 32.7 Pts
64-Core 36.5
2% 36.5 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7520G
Legend(17AA 397C) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.944.2.1000
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.67
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 3.16
3% 3.62 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4.43
3% 3.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003BSM1 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 56.7
Write 55.3
Mixed 24.7
34% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.37
82% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SHARETRONIC RMT3160ED58E9W1600 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback