HP ZBook 14 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook 14 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2216
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '18 at 11:35
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 102
1-Core 49.2
2-Core 88.6
55% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 65.6
8-Core 119
11% 92.1 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 2216) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.11.5
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 5.84
4% 5.68 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 4.37
Splatting 9.3
6% 6.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD6PP4M-256G-1006 256GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A200A06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 116 146 255 277 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 298
Write 190
Mixed 137
SusWrite 169
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 8.8
27% 8.73 MB/s
DQ Read 15.7
DQ Write 24.2
DQ Mixed 17.6
14% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 103%
IC25N040 ATMR04-0 40GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 22 19 18 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 21.8
Write 23
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 19.8
27% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.2% Below average
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 7.4
15% 5.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 1
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 16.5
242% 16.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 14 G2 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 14 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback