Asus P7H55-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 24 '18 at 00:41
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 135
57% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 181
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.63
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 35.5
30% 33.7 fps
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 5.09
16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 24% Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 28 22 42 51 22 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26% Poor
Read 207
Write 150
Mixed 136
SusWrite 35.4
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 11
48% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 25.7
DQ Mixed 21.1
16% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26%
Great: 56%
WD WD3200JD-22K 320GB
190GB free
Firmware: 08.05J08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 33 30 37 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 48
Write 55.8
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 36
33% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 36%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46
57GB free
Firmware: P22OAB3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 58 58 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 56.7
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 57.8
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33%
Great: 39%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
62GB free
Firmware: 10.01E04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 30 24 43 51 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 48.5
Write 53.5
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 36.2
33% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 33%
Generic SD Card Reader 16GB
13GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3 2 2.4 2.1 2.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 6.2
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 2.4
9% 8.18 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
19% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
30.5% Below average
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 13.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8.6
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback