Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120926
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 29 '18 at 07:11
Run Duration354 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 51.1
30% 44 Pts
4-Core 91.3
8-Core 165
15% 128 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Sapphire(174B E241) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 47
29% 38.4 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 37.2
27% 32.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 153 82 51 45 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 355
Write 275
Mixed 237
SusWrite 91.3
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 22.6
69% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 90.3
DQ Write 83.4
DQ Mixed 82.4
63% 85.4 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 126%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2.5TB free
Firmware: 81.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 103 133 137 138 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 134
Write 132
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 129
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 83%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 76 95 101 102 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 94.5
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-1866C9-8GSR F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-1866C9-8GSR 24GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $213
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback