Asus N53SM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N53SM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N53SM
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 01 '18 at 08:52
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 149
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 359
40% 313 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 2114) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 4.69
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.78
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1500LM006 HN-M151RAD 1.5TB
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BC10005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 54 59 56 52 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 59
Write 63
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 55.3
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 67%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
158GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 67 84 76 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 90.7
Write 55.2
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 72.5
49% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-071.A00LF 9905428-071.A00LF 9905428-071.A00LF Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N53SM Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N53SM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback