Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '18 at 01:31
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 191
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 333
48% 354 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5057
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Lighting 3.57
Reflection 6.27
Parallax 6.09
3% 5.31 fps
MRender 8.62
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.17
5% 6.02 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 459
Write 388
Mixed 291
84% 380 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 41.8
171% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 36.6
105% 223 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 104%
Samsun HD321HJ 320GB
113GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.6 0.9 2.7 1.1 1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.92% Terrible
Read 25.8
Write 3.8
Mixed 2.3
SusWrite 1.2
6% 8.27 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.3
77% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.92%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 99U5584-010.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.7% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 18.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 18.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H - $40

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback