Today's hottest deals

Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus B85M-E  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140516
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 22 '16 at 23:50
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 398
53% 397 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 83E0) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6451
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 23.6
Parallax 18
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 22.1
19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 130
Write 106
Mixed 79.6
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.16
75% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
156GB free
Firmware: MCCI
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25% Poor
Read 45.3
Write 41.7
Mixed 43
33% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.33
81% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 25%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
105GB free
Firmware:
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
24% Poor
Read 41.7
Write 41.5
Mixed 41.2
31% 41.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.27
86% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 24%
Great: 112%
ICY BOX BOX IB-3620 1TB
589GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 152
Write 160
Mixed 157
203% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.31
83% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 63%
ICY BOX BOX IB-3620 1TB
129GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 144
Write 145
Mixed 99.1
163% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.21
52% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.3% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 3,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback