Today's hottest deals

IBM System x3650 -[7979BEG]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIBM System x3650 -[7979BEG]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM System Planar
Memory46.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '18 at 17:51
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5440
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 37
2-Core 79.2
38% 59.7 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 324
29% 243 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 147GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 85 85 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 297
Write 177
Mixed 330
SusWrite 84.1
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 23
75% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 12.4
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 22.4
17% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 54%
Adaptec Array 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 41 43 41 43 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.2% Average
Read 323
Write 255
Mixed 330
SusWrite 42.5
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 23.9
74% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 32.3
DQ Mixed 24.9
19% 26 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 62%
Adaptec Array 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 75 80 74 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 337
Write 248
Mixed 345
SusWrite 74.3
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 23.5
78% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 11.5
DQ Write 32.7
DQ Mixed 12.5
12% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12x4GB
12 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback