Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$270 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 77.7 1-Core 134 2-Core 278 88% 163 Pts	4-Core 545 8-Core 964 91% 754 Pts	64-Core 1,491 92% 1,491 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 96%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 1TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 884GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 453 454 454 454 454 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 432 Write 453 Mixed 426 SusWrite 453 100% 441 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 84.4 4K Mixed 50.3 166% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 231 174% 235 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 107%
Adaptec Array 4TB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: V1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 38 41 38 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965684-032.A00G 2x16GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.4% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 31.3 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.3 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 30.8 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 116%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 154%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 169%

UFO

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $241Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	3x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $355Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	2x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 402%, 182,136 samples	1x
Rocket Q 1TBSabrentBench 192%, 30,033 samples	1x
PM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,882 samples	1x

RAM
CT32G4DFD832A.M16FF 2x31.5GBCrucialBench 95%, 336 samples	3x
16ATF4G64AZ-3G2F1 CT32G4DFD832A.M16FF CT32G4DFD832A.C16FF CT32G4DFD832A.M16FF 127GBMicronBench 109%, 1 sample	1x
CT32G4DFD832A.C16FF 2x31.5GBCrucialBench 96%, 183 samples	1x

Value: 116% - Outstanding

Total price: $776