Today's hottest deals

Asus WS X299 SAGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus WS X299 SAGE  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '18 at 01:54
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$325
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 73.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 238
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 1,003
86% 739 Pts
64-Core 1,750
108% 1,750 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8528) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 44.8
Parallax 39.9
38% 43.8 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 36.2
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1068 848 820 798 784 747 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,915
Write 1,022
Mixed 723
SusWrite 844
249% 1,126 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 52.3
224% 90.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,151
DQ Write 903
DQ Mixed 958
736% 1,004 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 241%
Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$87
136GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1076 435 309 310 312 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,106
Write 1,053
Mixed 553
SusWrite 459
177% 793 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 15.1
86% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,089
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 686
610% 919 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 143%
Great: 236%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
280GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 76 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 94.3
Write 86.3
Mixed 52
SusWrite 77.1
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 61%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
1TB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 96 94 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 96.3
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58%
Great: 61%
Adaptec Array 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 63 61 63 61 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 76.5
Write 88.8
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 63.4
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
71% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 108%
Adaptec Array 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 98 85 88 96 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 157
Write 110
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 89.6
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
164% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
876GB free
Firmware: MJAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 111 113 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
65% Good
Read 114
Write 111
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 112
68% 94 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65%
Great: 91%
LaCie d2 quadra 2TB
454GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 21.3
Write 12.8
Mixed 15
SusWrite 12.8
20% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C17 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90% Outstanding
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 49.1
MC Mixed 29.5
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 9.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90%
Great: 168%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS X299 SAGE Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS X299 SAGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,625
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback