Asus A320M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A320M-C (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161111
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '18 at 13:36
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9800 APU (2016 M.BR) 4,241 User benchmarks, average bench 44% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 71.9 1-Core 72.3 2-Core 132 55% 92.2 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 208 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 226 14% 226 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3739) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.4% Above average	Lighting 75 Reflection 72.4 Parallax 68.1 61% 71.8 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 69.4 Splatting 0.09 33% 45.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 93 91 98 99 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 111 Write 109 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 101 63% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 520GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 146 153 153 153 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 158 Write 145 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 150 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.4 102% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-028.A00G 1x8GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.6% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 7.1 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 97 41% 97 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-C Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A320M-C

CPU
A12-9800 APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 44%, 4,241 samples	1x
A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)AMDBench 40%, 12,273 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
M.2 PCIe SSD 256GBSpccBench 162%, 15,205 samples	1x
M.2 P310 240GBPatriotBench 180%, 652 samples	1x

RAM
M378A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,582 samples	1x
Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 68%, 2,566 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16