Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite L655

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite L655  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '18 at 18:26
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Memory 46.1
1-Core 48.1
2-Core 77.9
35% 57.4 Pts
4-Core 71.8
8-Core 78
10% 74.9 Pts
64-Core 76
5% 76 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FD10) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$31
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 50 65 21 64 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.4% Poor
Read 209
Write 121
Mixed 61
SusWrite 46
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 10.7
38% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 6.4
DQ Mixed 39
32% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5673FH0-CF8 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
21.3% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.4
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.1
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L655 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L655

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback