bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 704 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 23 '18 at 15:17
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
CPU #000, 8 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 47.8
1-Core 44.5
2-Core 131
41% 74.5 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 649
49% 442 Pts
64-Core 649
40% 649 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 17 22 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
28% Poor
Read 384
Write 207
Mixed 293
SusWrite 16.1
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 1.9
33% 9.77 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 85.7
DQ Mixed 32.5
32% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28%
Great: 81%
Vmware Virtual disk 86GB
78GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 20 22 22 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 369
Write 268
Mixed 298
SusWrite 18
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 1.7
30% 8.8 MB/s
DQ Read 81.3
DQ Write 87
DQ Mixed 95.3
69% 87.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 80%
Vmware Virtual disk 548GB
308GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 19 27 41 18 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
Read 406
Write 289
Mixed 339
SusWrite 31.4
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 11.7
45% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 95.8
DQ Mixed 112
89% 125 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 38%
Vmware Virtual disk 137GB
126GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 14 25 40 18 50 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
6.83% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 25.9
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 29.6
6% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 0.6
7% 4.07 MB/s
DQ Read 9.3
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 59.3
45% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 84%
Vmware Virtual disk 137GB
123GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 59 16 41 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 384
Write 307
Mixed 299
SusWrite 31.7
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 1.7
31% 9.07 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 98.8
DQ Mixed 93.7
72% 98.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 84%
Vmware Virtual disk 275GB
256GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 40 41 21 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 14.6
Write 10.6
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 29.1
14% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.1
84% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 67%
Vmware Virtual disk 137GB
127GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 33 19 12 9.8 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 39.9
Write 38.2
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 16.7
22% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 77%
Vmware Virtual disk 462GB
42GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 19 23 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 57% Great: 81%
Vmware Virtual disk 462GB
41GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 20 20 20 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.4% Good
Read 207
Write 16.9
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 18
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 1
376% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 128 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 32.9
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 14.3
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback