Asus P7P55D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101029
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateOct 24 '18 at 19:55
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 150
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 384
40% 321 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Gigabyte(1458 34FA) 768MB
CLim: 715 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 391.24
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 13.2
12% 15.3 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 15.2
14% 17 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 65 43 35 35 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.9% Average
Read 212
Write 200
Mixed 194
SusWrite 62.3
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 28.8
94% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 34.3
DQ Mixed 14.9
15% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 91%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$66
33GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.6 5 5.2 9.9 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 13.5
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 7.7
13% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 67%
ST3000VN 000-1HJ166 3TB
889GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.4% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 25.5
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 25.7
36% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 2.1
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E Builds (Compare 786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback