Asus K30AM-J_A_F_K31AM-J

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus K30AM-J_A_F_K31AM-J (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K30AM-J_A_F_K31AM-J
Memory	0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150910
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '19 at 18:55
Run Duration	311 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1800 5,848 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 1170, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	31.3% Below average	Memory 56.7 1-Core 21.4 2-Core 37.6 28% 38.6 Pts	4-Core 37.4 8-Core 39.8 5% 38.6 Pts	64-Core 34 2% 34 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8534) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.91 1% 0.93 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.48 1% 1.31 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 102 141 126 116 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	51% Above average	Read 52 Write 117 Mixed 28 SusWrite 125 58% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 103%
ST3000VN 000-1HJ166 3TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1TB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 155 152 159 150 154 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60.7% Good	Read 150 Write 163 Mixed 67.8 SusWrite 154 179% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 61%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 2.4 3.3 2.9 3.2 2.9 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	4.72% Terrible	Read 20.6 Write 17.7 Mixed 11.7 SusWrite 3.3 16% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.72% Great: 6%
MKNSSDCR 480GB-DX 480GB 298GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 36 34 36 31 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.6% Below average	Read 36.3 Write 36 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 34.5 49% 35.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 7 521% 7.33 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB 38,580 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 2.3 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K30AM-J_A_F_K31AM-J Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K30AM-J_A_F_K31AM-J

CPU
Celeron J1800IntelBench 30%, 5,848 samples	13x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	13x

SSD
CS900 480GBPNY $38Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	1x
BX500 120GBCrucial $49Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	1x
60GB SSD 60GB3Bench 55%, 142 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBAdataBench 31%, 5,816 samples	4x
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 2x2GBHynixBench 34%, 1,493 samples	4x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 9,805 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406