Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KT334AA-ABA m8530f (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON VIOLA
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080505
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '18 at 14:21
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9550 2,773 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	45% Average	Memory 69 1-Core 31.9 2-Core 64.1 38% 55 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 127 17% 126 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% EVGA(3842 1302) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.09% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.32 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.78 1% 1.69 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 1.09% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssd2sc24 0G1CS1754D11 240GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 74 76 91 77 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.2% Poor	Read 122 Write 106 Mixed 99.3 SusWrite 86.1 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 11 4K Mixed 9.3 32% 9.87 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 88.8 DQ Mixed 87.2 68% 92.5 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 55%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 1,524 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2.5TB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 30 26 27 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 24.3 Mixed 26.4 SusWrite 27.3 37% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 82% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 8.7 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.6 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM