Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemECT
MotherboardMSI Z97-G43 (MS-7816)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150529
Uptime7 Days
Run DateOct 29 '18 at 13:32
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$56
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 94.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 216
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 428
58% 430 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1401) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 44.7
Reflection 43.3
Parallax 39.1
36% 42.4 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 34.7
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 189 181 185 182 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 487
Mixed 377
SusWrite 209
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 59.2
204% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 361
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
836GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 132 129 131 131 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 173
Write 186
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 130
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D169DS1J.8FE 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 17.7
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback