Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II P360 1,500 User benchmarks, average bench 36% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	36% Below average	Memory 61.5 1-Core 33.6 2-Core 64.2 35% 53.1 Pts	4-Core 63.7 8-Core 65 9% 64.3 Pts	64-Core 60.9 4% 60.9 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 11,054 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 9077) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	0.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.44 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 0.86 Gravity 0.13 Splatting 1.17 1% 0.72 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.57% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 149 163 166 161 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.9% Below average	Read 189 Write 155 Mixed 177 SusWrite 155 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 31.7 4K Mixed 19.1 59% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 1.7 DQ Mixed 0.8 18% 48 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 128%
Generic 2.0 Reader -SD 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 18GB free, PID 0186 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	9.57% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 13.4 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 12.5 19% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.1 124% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 9.57% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	20.8% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 8.2 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 6.2 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16