Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KPL-AM EPU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM EPU  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 31 '18 at 04:52
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5800-$58
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 43.8
2-Core 82.8
41% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 70.9
8-Core 82.5
10% 76.7 Pts
64-Core 82
5% 82 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Zotac(19DA 1346) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 19.8
18% 19.5 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 58 48 68 71 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 91.3
Write 94.2
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 60.9
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 62%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
681GB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 68 70 71 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 120
Write 99.8
Mixed 60
SusWrite 66.9
111% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37%
Great: 64%
ST6000DX 000-1H217Z 6TB
68GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 9.6 9.9 8.1 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 128
Write 99.2
Mixed 52
SusWrite 10.4
86% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
124% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 77%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB
11GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.3 1.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 94
Write 96.7
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 1.6
76% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20%
Great: 59%
ST3000VN 007-2E4166 3TB
23GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 57 62 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.2% Below average
Read 140
Write 122
Mixed 62
SusWrite 58.8
121% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 53%
WDC WD20 EADS-11R6B1 2TB
278GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.4 2.1 1.7 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 77.5
Write 78.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 2.2
66% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM EPU Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM EPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback