Today's hottest deals

Asus P9X79 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateApr 04 '18 at 02:22
Run Duration372 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 188
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 561
54% 446 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 842E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 37.4
Parallax 49.8
33% 42.6 fps
MRender 50.4
Gravity 45.5
Splatting 34.8
35% 43.6 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GCSU 512GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JURA
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 341
Write 144
Mixed 225
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 26.2
81% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 1.95
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 72.7
52% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
891GB free
Firmware: 0A80
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 109
Write 99.7
Mixed 89.4
75% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.16
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 96%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
544GB free
Firmware: 0A80
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 85
Mixed 85.2
69% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.19
77% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 83%
ASMT 2105 8TB
3TB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 183
Write 193
Mixed 182
242% 186 MB/s
4K Read 1.61
4K Write 5.93
4K Mixed 0.31
218% 2.61 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 87%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 147
Write 136
Mixed 58.5
136% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.54
4K Mixed 0.25
97% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 59%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 62.1
Write 56.5
Mixed 58.3
75% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.19
79% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 56%
ASMT 2105 4TB
312GB free, PID null
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
36% Below average
Read 78.3
Write 79.7
Mixed 74.6
100% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.31
4K Mixed 0.25
90% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36%
Great: 61%
ASMT 2105 3TB
51GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 138
Write 127
Mixed 104
154% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.29
79% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 71%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA200 2TB
49GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.8% Average
Read 107
Write 115
Mixed 36.5
105% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.14
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.25
78% 1.1 MB/s
TOSHIBA MD04ACA200 2TB
37GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.9% Above average
Read 110
Write 135
Mixed 22.7
109% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.23
82% 1.03 MB/s
TOSHIBA MD04ACA200 2TB
23GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.2% Average
Read 105
Write 116
Mixed 15.5
94% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.26
84% 1.16 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C10 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 29.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 72.1
55% 72.1 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 DELUXE Builds (Compare 638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 DELUXE - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,060
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback