Asus P9X79 DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121126
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '18 at 02:22
Run Duration	372 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 97.7 2-Core 188 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 561 54% 446 Pts	64-Core 703 44% 703 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Asus(1043 842E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	33.6% Below average	Lighting 40.6 Reflection 37.4 Parallax 49.8 33% 42.6 fps	MRender 50.4 Gravity 45.5 Splatting 34.8 35% 43.6 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GCSU 512GB 1,378 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: JURA Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 341 Write 144 Mixed 225 52% 237 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 26.2 81% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 1.95 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 72.7 52% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 107%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 891GB free Firmware: 0A80 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 109 Write 99.7 Mixed 89.4 75% 99.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.16 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 96%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 544GB free Firmware: 0A80 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 105 Write 85 Mixed 85.2 69% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.19 77% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 83%
ASMT 2105 8TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 3TB free, PID null Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Read 183 Write 193 Mixed 182 242% 186 MB/s	4K Read 1.61 4K Write 5.93 4K Mixed 0.31 218% 2.61 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 87%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 147 Write 136 Mixed 58.5 136% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 2.54 4K Mixed 0.25 97% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 59%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 62.1 Write 56.5 Mixed 58.3 75% 59 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.19 79% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 56%
ASMT 2105 4TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 312GB free, PID null Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	36% Below average	Read 78.3 Write 79.7 Mixed 74.6 100% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.31 4K Mixed 0.25 90% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 61%
ASMT 2105 3TB 228 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 51GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 138 Write 127 Mixed 104 154% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.29 79% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 71%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA200 2TB 49GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.8% Average	Read 107 Write 115 Mixed 36.5 105% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.14 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.25 78% 1.1 MB/s

TOSHIBA MD04ACA200 2TB 37GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.9% Above average	Read 110 Write 135 Mixed 22.7 109% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.23 82% 1.03 MB/s

TOSHIBA MD04ACA200 2TB 23GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.2% Average	Read 105 Write 116 Mixed 15.5 94% 78.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.11 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.26 84% 1.16 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C10 8x8GB 190 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 29.3 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 12.2 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 72.1 55% 72.1 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 DELUXE Builds (Compare 610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 DELUXE - $500

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	253x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	162x
Core i7-3960XIntel $265Bench 78%, 2,165 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	31x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	26x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	16x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	11x
DDR3 1600G DDR3 1600G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 12GBAdataBench 52%, 28 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,060

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16