Today's hottest deals

Asus Maximus Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Maximus Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '16 at 17:26
Run Duration859 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 74
1-Core 38.3
2-Core 76.3
42% 62.9 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 149
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.1% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 133
Parallax 129
82% 121 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 134
Splatting 113
99% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 211
Write 49.9
Mixed 59.5
23% 107 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 9.45
72% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 58.4
DQ Mixed 9.6
17% 32 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 153
Mixed 68.4
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.18
107% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
639GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 150
Write 123
Mixed 60.4
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.17
85% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 107%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
89GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 68.9
Write 65.4
Mixed 20.5
38% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.25
72% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
37GB free
Firmware: CC35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 63
Write 65.2
Mixed 17.3
35% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.46
106% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 68%
ASMT 2105 4TB
2TB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 28.4
Mixed 9.08
27% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.96
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.26
98% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 61%
ASMT 2105 4TB
1.5TB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 29.1
Mixed 23.8
36% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.51
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.28
95% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 61%
ASMT 2105 3TB
11GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 29.2
Mixed 6.56
26% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.19
58% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 58%
GO! Finder 2GB
1GB free, PID 2272
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 4.02
Mixed 0.56
5% 6.02 MB/s
4K Read 2.98
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.008
12% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 5%
ASMT 2105 3TB
0GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 17.9
Mixed 11.7
23% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 0.76
4K Mixed 0.19
33% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus Formula Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Maximus Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback