Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory81GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 81GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory26 GB free of 81 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateNov 02 '18 at 12:23
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-4620 v2
None, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.3% Average
Memory 41.1
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 124
40% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 531
47% 398 Pts
64-Core 1,033
64% 1,033 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 136GB
86GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 165 177 153 155 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 332
Write 182
Mixed 367
SusWrite 167
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 17.6
60% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 263
188% 247 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 79%
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 161GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 24 27 24 23 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 51% Great: 72%
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 397GB
97GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 58 59 45 64 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.2% Below average
Read 52.2
Write 35.7
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 73.9
32% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 0.83 MB/s
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 161GB
51GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 24 27 24 23 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.7% Good
Read 187
Write 141
Mixed 100
SusWrite 26.4
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 2.4
477% 3 MB/s
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 107GB
51GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 24 27 24 23 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 85%
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 537GB
144GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 24 27 24 23 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 86.8
Write 75.5
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 26.4
42% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.4
322% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 81GB
null MHz
3968, 32767, 4737, 23422, 18050 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
23.6% Poor
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 2
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback