HP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8105
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 07 '18 at 13:29
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 198
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 358
49% 364 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 8105) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 6.15
Parallax 6.16
3% 5.38 fps
MRender 7.14
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.09
5% 5.52 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon IT LCS-128L9S-HH 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9C08
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 478
Write 325
Mixed 268
79% 357 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 37.7
136% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 38.8
94% 197 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 90%
ASMT 2115 1TB
171GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 76
126% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 1315 ST102464BA1339.M16 12GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.5% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback