Today's hottest deals

HP 500-267c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-267c  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '18 at 04:19
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 180
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 343
45% 337 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
EVGA(3842 2619) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.54
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.49% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.92
Parallax 1.62
2% 1.78 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 1.57
2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.49%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GHFSS2SSD32GS3 32GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 96 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 176
Write 101
Mixed 105
SusWrite 74.1
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 6.4
77% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 62.3
DQ Mixed 9.1
16% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35%
Great: 38%
Hitachi HDS724040KLSA80 400GB-$133
47GB free
Firmware: KFAOA32A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 42 45 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 50
Write 41.7
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 43.9
31% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
312GB free
Firmware: 3.CHN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 67 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 70
Write 74.8
Mixed 48
SusWrite 69.6
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.8% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 8.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-267c Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-267c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback