Asrock FM2A55M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '18 at 14:03
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X2 340 Dual Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 37.9
2-Core 61.4
35% 52.7 Pts
4-Core 80.1
8-Core 78.5
11% 79.3 Pts
64-Core 85.8
5% 85.8 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1701.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.51 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 23 18 20 29 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.6% Poor
Read 145
Write 128
Mixed 146
SusWrite 43.3
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 8
43% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 111
94% 136 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
26% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.6
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A55M-DGS Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback