Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X2 340 Dual Core 785 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	36.1% Below average	Memory 58.8 1-Core 37.9 2-Core 61.4 35% 52.7 Pts	4-Core 80.1 8-Core 78.5 11% 79.3 Pts	64-Core 85.8 5% 85.8 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E164) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1701.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.13% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.81 Parallax 1.59 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.51 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.13% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 23 18 20 29 31 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.6% Poor	Read 145 Write 128 Mixed 146 SusWrite 43.3 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 27.9 4K Mixed 8 43% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 111 94% 136 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5673FH0-CH9 4GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	26% Poor	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 9.2 26% 9.03 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 8.6 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	5x
PM830 mSATA 128GBSamsungBench 54%, 663 samples	4x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	2x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 40%, 643 samples	1x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $147