Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 166 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 320 43% 324 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 04AD) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.9 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 226 22 28 50 13 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30% Below average	Read 252 Write 222 Mixed 27.1 SusWrite 79.4 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 0.6 39% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 69.1 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 1.3 31% 72.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5673FH0-CH9 4GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 14.4 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,229x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	453x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	396x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	80x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	59x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	50x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278