Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '18 at 18:41
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 169
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 596
56% 463 Pts
64-Core 1,651
102% 1,651 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.7% Good
Lighting 76
Reflection 82.3
Parallax 72.8
62% 77 fps
MRender 79.5
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 65.1
58% 72.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 237 239 241 242 241 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.9% Good
Read 254
Write 244
Mixed 244
SusWrite 241
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 28.9
96% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 159
119% 160 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 128%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
2TB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 101 109 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 104
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 67%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 320GB
267GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 95 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 93.3
Write 93
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 95.4
106% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 49.5
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 34.3
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8.5
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R920 POWER Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $122
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback