HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110714
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '17 at 15:18
Run Duration	361 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 68.4 1-Core 81.2 2-Core 148 58% 99.2 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 203 28% 205 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 344.75 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	2.87% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4.62 Parallax 3.41 3% 4.01 fps	MRender 4.43 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 0.09 2% 2.94 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.87% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2009)-$152 5,563 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 455GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 187 152 1650 (04) Start/Stop count 72 72 28036 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4390 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1963 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 38161 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 261 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 127 127 221522 (C2) HDA temperature 109 82 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 8 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	34.2% Below average	Read 59.3 Write 60.1 Mixed 16.1 33% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.06 4K Write 0.37 4K Mixed 0.06 16% 0.16 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 47%
Samsung HD254GJ 250GB 1,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 7GB free Firmware: 1AJ10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 84 83 5123 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1896 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11346 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1862 (B7) Unknown 252 252 0 (B8) Unknown 252 252 0 (BA) Unknown 252 252 0 (BB) vendor-specific 252 252 0 (BC) Unknown 252 252 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 60 171799740449 (BF) G-sense error rate 252 252 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1910 (C2) HDA temperature 64 60 171799740449 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 3	46.4% Average	Read 76.1 Write 85.4 Mixed 63.7 56% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.41 97% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 76%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 320GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 176GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 21.2 Mixed 8.76 23% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.28 44% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 40%
TOSHIBA MK3275GSX 320GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 57GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 29.4 Write 21.7 Mixed 8.89 23% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.2 59% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 30%
Intenso Business 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.29% Terrible	Read 15.7 Write 9.98 Mixed 9.06 14% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.005 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.29% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:83 0B M2F2G64CB88G7N-CG ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:83 0B M2F2G64CB88G7N-CG 44GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.9% Below average	MC Read 10 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 13.2 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 8.6 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	388x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	73x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	61x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	285x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	65x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	56x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	17x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	13x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 44GBUnknownBench 30%, 232 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16