Gigabyte GA-H81M-H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H81M-H (all builds)
Memory	7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150810
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '18 at 21:08
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1820-$56 4,011 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	21.5% Poor	Memory 28.3 1-Core 52.9 2-Core 102 33% 61.1 Pts	4-Core 79.8 8-Core 112 12% 95.8 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 58%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 3.19 Parallax 2.72 2% 2.65 fps	MRender 3.52 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 3.43 2% 2.66 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% EVGA(3842 2753) CLim: 1489 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 15.9 Parallax 16.7 15% 17.1 fps	MRender 23.7 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 17.7 16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 299GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 112 113 98 94 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 119 Write 116 Mixed 59.2 SusWrite 102 72% 99 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 109%
WD WD3000JS-60PDB0 300GB 1,177 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 101GB free Firmware: 21.00M22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 44 44 46 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Read 54 Write 45.2 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 43.8 34% 45.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 1315 CT51264BA1339.C16F 12GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 7.3 15% 5.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 265 15% 265 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H81M-H Builds (Compare 1,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-H - $112

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	207x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	203x
Core i5-4440Intel $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	105x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	252x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	77x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	111x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	63x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	53x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	26x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $290

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16