Fujitsu CELSIUS M730

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M730 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A2
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131014
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '18 at 06:48
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 106 2-Core 205 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 520 53% 427 Pts	64-Core 520 32% 520 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 347.52 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Lighting 15.8 Reflection 14.5 Parallax 18.5 13% 16.2 fps	MRender 21.5 Gravity 14.3 Splatting 17 14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256 256GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 224 228 223 232 222 MB/s Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	71.5% Very good	Read 252 Write 215 Mixed 158 SusWrite 222 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 31.3 136% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 60.3 72% 125 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 931GB free Firmware: 1H15 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 1.5 1% 1.5 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 74%
USB2.0 FlashDisk 1GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 0163 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	3.72% Terrible	Read 13.5 Write 3.5 Mixed 5 SusWrite 4.1 7% 6.53 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.72% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- 2x16GB 274 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	66.3% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 23.1 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.3 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M730 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M730

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	40x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	9x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	6x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	13x
NVS 310NvidiaBench 1%, 4,920 samples	7x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
HG6 256GBToshibaBench 86%, 4,588 samples	4x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8C 4x4GBHynixBench 70%, 26 samples	8x
M393B1G73QH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 87%, 67 samples	4x
M393B2G70DB0- 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 461 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16