Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z77N-WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77N-WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '18 at 01:35
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 90.4
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 151
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 498
34% 318 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
EVGA(3842 2643) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.25% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 7.81
Parallax 9.06
7% 8.39 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.25%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X35510RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 413 369 276 263 261 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 468
Write 424
Mixed 298
SusWrite 327
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 30.5
110% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 181
163% 252 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 107%
H/W RAID 0 (Striping) 4TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 104 110 110 110 103 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
Read 153
Write 94
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 107
121% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 54%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Z3A0 1TB
921GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 59 65 61 67 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 142
Write 126
Mixed 111
SusWrite 63.3
144% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
120% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 53%
WDC WD10 03FZEX-00MK2A0 1TB
744GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 1.1 2.6 0.8 0.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 175
Write 162
Mixed 134
SusWrite 1.6
149% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
134% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 68%
ST320006 41AS 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 59 64 60 66 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 134
Write 133
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 62.7
134% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.1
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 48%
ST320006 41AS 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 1.5 1.1 0.2 0.6 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 126
Write 120
Mixed 84
SusWrite 3.9
104% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
336GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.4 5.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 90.8
Write 69.3
Mixed 46
SusWrite 1.3
62% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
27% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 40%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 55 47 52 49 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 113
Write 104
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 50.7
97% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 40%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 53 43 42 39 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 181
Write 97.2
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 47
104% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 0.5
314% 3.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 0.5
365% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 65%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 0.9 5.1 1.6 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 101
Write 104
Mixed 38
SusWrite 5.2
76% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 40%
Sony Storage Media 8GB
7GB free, PID 02a5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.5 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Read 24
Write 6.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.7
10% 9.85 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 12
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77N-WIFI Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77N-WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback